Protein biomarkers GDF15 and FGF21 to differentiate mitochondrial hepatopathies from other pediatric liver diseases.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial hepatopathies (MHs) are primary mitochondrial genetic disorders that can present as childhood liver disease. No recognized biomarkers discriminate MH from other childhood liver diseases. The protein biomarkers growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) differentiate mitochondrial myopathies from other myopathies. We evaluated these biomarkers to determine if they discriminate MH from other liver diseases in children. METHODS: Serum biomarkers were measured in 36 children with MH (17 had a genetic diagnosis); 38 each with biliary atresia, α1-antitrypsin deficiency, and Alagille syndrome; 20 with NASH; and 186 controls. RESULTS: GDF15 levels compared to controls were mildly elevated in patients with α1-antitrypsin deficiency, Alagille syndrome, and biliary atresia-young subgroup, but markedly elevated in MH (p<0.001). FGF21 levels were mildly elevated in NASH and markedly elevated in MH (p<0.001). Both biomarkers were higher in patients with MH with a known genetic cause but were similar in acute and chronic presentations. Both markers had a strong performance to identify MH with a molecular diagnosis with the AUC for GDF15 0.93±0.04 and for FGF21 0.90±0.06. Simultaneous elevation of both markers >98th percentile of controls identified genetically confirmed MH with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 96%. In MH, independent predictors of survival without requiring liver transplantation were international normalized ratio and either GDF15 or FGF21 levels, with levels <2000 ng/L predicting survival without liver transplantation (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: GDF15 and FGF21 are significantly higher in children with MH compared to other childhood liver diseases and controls and, when combined, were predictive of MH and had prognostic implications.

Cerebrospinal fluid amino acids glycine, serine, and threonine in nonketotic hyperglycinemia.

Nonketotic hyperglycinemia (NKH) is caused by deficient glycine cleavage enzyme activity and characterized by elevated brain glycine. Metabolism of glycine is connected enzymatically to serine through serine hydroxymethyltransferase and shares transporters with serine and threonine. We aimed to evaluate changes in serine and threonine in NKH patients, and relate this to clinical outcome severity. Age-related reference values were developed for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) serine and threonine from 274 controls, and in a cross-sectional study compared to 61 genetically proven NKH patients, categorized according to outcome. CSF d-serine and l-serine levels were stereoselectively determined in seven NKH patients and compared to 29 age-matched controls. In addition to elevated CSF glycine, NKH patients had significantly decreased levels of CSF serine and increased levels of CSF threonine, even after age-adjustment. The CSF serine/threonine ratio discriminated between NKH patients and controls. The CSF glycine/serine aided in discrimination between severe and attenuated neonates with NKH. Over all ages, the CSF glycine, serine and threonine had moderate to fair correlation with outcome classes. After age-adjustment, only the CSF glycine level provided good discrimination between outcome classes. In untreated patients, d-serine was more reduced than l-serine, with a decreased d/l-serine ratio, indicating a specific impact on d-serine metabolism. We conclude that in NKH the elevation of glycine is accompanied by changes in l-serine, d-serine and threonine, likely reflecting a perturbation of the serine shuttle and metabolism, and of one-carbon metabolism. This provides additional guidance on diagnosis and prognosis, and opens new therapeutic avenues to be explored.

Drug interaction screening in SWOG clinical trials.

PURPOSE: The frequency and process for drug interaction (DI) screening at sites enrolling patients into SWOG clinical trials were studied. METHODS: Survey invitations were e-mailed to 180 SWOG head clinical research associates to determine the frequency of and personnel involved in DI assessment in subjects who were screened for and enrolled in clinical trials at their sites. Descriptive statistics were performed to evaluate the data. RESULTS: A total of 83 surveys recorded a response to at least 1 question, yielding an overall response rate of 46.1%. At least 72 completed surveys were submitted, for a completion rate of 40.0%. The majority of sites (51%) reported that DI screening only occurred during eligibility assessment when a DI was included in the protocol exclusion criteria. The pharmacist was "always" involved in DI screening during eligibility assessment at 17% of sites. Clinical research coordinators (56%) and research nurses (45%) were the predominant personnel who performed DI screening to assess eligibility for trial enrollment. A subset of sites (3-6%) reported not having access to a pharmacist. Fewer than 10% of sites reported that they "always" use drug information services, websites, resources, or literature searches, though many tools were used "often" or "sometimes" by more than 20% of sites. CONCLUSION: A survey revealed that DI screening was not being systematically conducted within SWOG clinical trials. When DI screening did occur, it was primarily conducted by clinical research coordinators or study nurses. Pharmacist-led DI screening was not the current practice within SWOG sites surveyed and was precluded by a lack of pharmacists' availability or involvement.

Clinical evaluation of compounds targeting PD-1/PD-L1 pathway for cancer immunotherapy.

Significant enthusiasm currently exists for new immunotherapeutic strategies: blocking the interaction between programmed death-1 receptor on T-cells and programmed death-ligand 1 on tumor cells to boost immune system stimulation to fight cancer. Immunomodulation with the antiprogrammed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 monoclonal antibodies has shown to mediate tumor shrinkage and extend overall survival from several pivotal phase I/II studies in melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. This has prompted multiple large ongoing phase III trials with the expectation for fast-track FDA approvals to satisfy unmet medical needs. Compounds targeting the programmed death-1 pathway that are in clinical trials fall into two major categories, namely antiprogrammed death-1 antibodies: Nivolumab, MK-3475, and pidilizumab; and antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 antibodies: MPDL3280A, BMS-936559, MEDI4736, and MSB0010718C. We reviewed the clinical efficacy and safety of each compound based upon major registered clinical trials and published clinical data. Overall, response rate of more than 20% is consistently seen across all these trials, with maximal response of approximately 50% achieved by certain single antiprogrammed death-1 agents or when used in combination with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 blockade. The responses seen are early, durable, and have continued after treatment discontinuation. Immune-related adverse events are the most common side effects seen in these clinical trials. Overall, the skin and gastrointestinal tract are the most common organ systems affected by these compounds while hepatic, endocrine, and neurologic events are less frequent. These side effects are low grade, manageable, and typically resolve within a relatively short time frame with a predictable resolution pattern given proper management. We therefore propose detailed guidelines for management of major immune-related adverse events that are anticipated with antiprogrammed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 therapies based on general experience with other monoclonal antibodies and the established management algorithms for immune-related adverse events for cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 blockade with ipilimumab. We anticipate that the antiprogrammed death-1 strategy will become a viable and crucial clinical strategy for cancer therapy.